Motion for Mistrial is Strange Case

September 20, 2009

After the Plaintiff's opening statement had concluded, Defense attorney Don Carlson made a motion for mistrial in the case based on comments made by Plaintiff attorney Harvey Levine.

Carlson said remarks concerning Geary being more interested in advertising sales than contestants were intended to bias the jury.  He also said remarks raising the issue of abortion could automatically make the jury sympathize with the family, and there had been no voir dire of that issue with the jury.

Judge Lloyd A. Phillips noted no objections had been made, and turned down the motion, but did admonish Levine for making irresponsible statements.  Phillips offered the defense an opportunity to draft an instruction to the jury regarding those statements.

Opening Statement - Plaintiffs in Jennifer Strange Trial

September 19, 2009

Opening arguments continued Friday in trial of the Wm. A, Strange et al  vs. Entercom Sacramento LLC et al. 

Attorney Roger Dreyer, who represents plaintiff Billy Strange and his children Ryland, 5, and Jorie, 3, laid out his case in detail against Entercom Sacramento, LLC, Market Manager John Geary, and Entercom Communications LLC.

Dreyer began the morning with an exhibit of Entercom's Contest Guidelines, sent to Market Manager John Geary, Station Manager Steve Weed, and Promotions Director Robin Pechota 8-31-06, four months prior to the "Hold Your Wee for a Nintendo Wii" contest which resulted in Jennifer Strange's death.  Entercom Communications attorney Carmela Masi also conducted a training session on the guidelines with Weed and Pechota in October 2006..

The Guidelines read, "Contests which are illegal, dangerous, misleading or rigged or in bad taste must be avoided."   "Last minute contest rules may be escalated to the Market Manager."  Then under the heading, "Review by Legal,"   "Written rules should be reviewed by your primary legal contact for the following:  any high risk, dangerous, or borderline acceptable contests."  (Dreyer emphasized the document said written rules should be reviewed, not must be reviewed.)   Importantly, the document also stated that material terms must be disclosed in both writing and in on-air announcements prior to the contest.  (This is so everyone understands all the rules before any contest begins.)

Dreyer said the evidence will show there was a set of written rules for the "Wii" contest, that it had been drafted by promotions Director Robin Pechota, using language from a different contest, "My Right Arm," which had been approved by the Legal department ("Legal.").  But he said the rules were never posted online in advance of the contest, nor were they read on the air, as required by Entercom Communications.    Dreyer said Jennifer Strange practiced the day before by drinking one 8-ounce glass of water, then timing how long she could hold it; as she thought that was what the contest required.

The rules stated that participants would drink one eight ounce glass of water every 15 minutes until the end.  The document further stated that participation may be hazardous, and particpants had to represent they were physically, psychologically, and medicall able to participate.  Also that Finalists assumed all risks associated with participating in the contest.  However, the written rules were never given to the particpants.

Instead, as contestants came into the studio on the morning of January 12, 2007, they were given a release form titled, "Release for All Claims Including Personal Injury," which did not detail any potential hazards that could arise from participating in a water drinking contest.  Dreyer noted that no one at Entercom has taken responsibility for drafting that release, and the Court has already ruled it is not a waiver.

They were subsequently advised by the Morning Rave hosts that they would have to drink one eight ounce glass of water every ten minutes, not fifteen, as their own rules stated, and that anyone who threw up or urinated would be out.  About midway through the contest, the Rave Hosts again changed the rules on the fly, saying contestants must now drink 16.9 ounce bottles of water instead, to speed up the contest.

Dreyer also cited a deposition which revealed that in December 2006, just weeks before the "Wii" contest, the on-air team joked about the 2005 water drinking death of Chico State student Matthew Carrington in a fraternity hazing incident.     During that 12-2006 Morning Rave show, on air hosts encouraged their "gag guy Fester" to drink several vases of water from a tulip vase.  "Fester" complained of being lightheaded at the time."

(Editor note: That incident, which also included having cold water thrown on Carrington and his having to perform pushups after drinking massive amounts of water, was widely publicized in the Sacramento area in 2005.  A search of the Sacramento Bee archives show 15 stories appeared on this case of water intoxication before the 2007 Jennifer Strange death.  The incident resulted in anti-hazing legislation known as Matt's Law.)

Dreyer noted contestants were not told about the Carrington death, nor were they told that the "Gag Guy Fester" had felt ill after consuming so much water.

Dreyer played audio clips of the "Wii" contest to a rapt jury, who heard the same on-air team say before the contest began, "Can't you get water poisoning and die?" 

(Editor note:  most of the audio played in opening statements can also be heard in the Broadcast Blues story on Jennifer Strange.)

Dreyer said that before the contest began, a nurse called the station, telling the On Air team that water intoxication was dangerous. That call did not go on the air. He said the show producer Liz Diaz received several calls about the dangers, but she was rebuffed by the on-air team, saying, "we've got releases, so we are not responsible," and when she tried to bring her concerns to Market Manager John Geary, he was too busy.

Dreyer also said former lifeguard from Chico called into the show to warn them of the Chico incident.  He also played the "Eva Brooks" call,  in which she says "Those people who are drinking all that water can get sick and possibly die from water intoxication."  The DJ's say they've signed releases so they are not responsible.

This call did go on the air, the attorney for Entercom, Don Carlson, said in his opening argument that contestants heard that call on the radio as the contest was going on. (More on the Defense Opening Statement later.)

Dreyer showed pictures of contestants during the contest, including one of a woman who just before she vomited.  He said other contestants had headaches, nausea, were lightheaded and vomiting.

Then he played the audio of Jennifer Strange, telling the Morning Rave Hosts, "My head hurts.  They told me it's from the water. "  "This is what it feels like when you're drowning," the DJ told her.   A grim looking jury glanced at Jennifer's widower, Billy Strange, during this audio clip.

Dreyer said after the contest, Jennifer told on air host Steve Maney that she didn’t think she could drive; he asked her  to wait in the lobby until she felt better. No medical attention was offered.

Jennifer called her husband, Billy, and told him she felt sick and was going to go home to go to bed.  When her Mother Nina could not reach her by phone, she went to Jennifer's house, where she found Jennifer dead at 2 PM.

Dreyer played a video deposition of Market Manager John Geary, who said the Market Manager is responsible for programming in bad taste, but agreed that if staff didn't tell him, he would not be able to give input."  He then played a deposition clip of Entercom Communications CEO David Fields who said he had no idea someone could die from this, but also a contest with potential for vomiting and urinating oneself was not a contest they would have done.  Dreyer said it was clear the contest had never gone to "Legal."

He also said expert testimony would show the psychology of a contest like this, an environment of competition where contestants trusted the radio station.

Dreyer concluded by saying that Jennifer Strange was given no notice of hazards, and while both sides stipulated that the contest did cause Jennifer's death, the question would be ,"Is it their conduct that caused her death, or her conduct that caused her death?"

Attorney Harvey Levine, who represents Jennifer's elder son, Keegan Sims, then began his own opening statement.  He showed a floorplan of KDND's offices and studios, and showed the proximity of the break room, where the contest was held, and the conference room, where a sales meeting was being held, and said Market Manager John Geary came into the room at one point telling them to hold down the noise.

He also played another audio clip of the contest, where people are vomiting in "chain reaction. "

Levine turned his attention to Entercom attorney Carmela Masi, who was the primary legal contact for KDND.   Masi testified in a videotaped deposition that it was an ironclad rule that anytime a contest required ingestion or elements of physicality, a medical person must be present.  However, this ironclad statement was not included in writing in Entercom's Contest Guidelines.  No medical personnel were present for the "Wii" contest.

Levine said a witness will liken doing a radio contest like "Wii" to the fascination in watching a car wreck, and that once you get the audience in that zone, you don’t want them to push another button on the radio dial.  He said as the program began, the hosts knew what they wer doing, that comments about dying from water intoxication and references to the hazing incident were meant to excite the audience.

He reiterated that the release form contestants had signed was invalid under California law, as it did not mention the contest was potentially hazardous.  He noted that Promotions Director Robin Pechota testified that she had received no training on running contests, and that she "trusted her gut" as to whether something might be dangerous.

Pechota was to clear the contest rules with Masi;  but Levine showed that Masi, who works out of the Boston office, is reponsible for a myriad of legal responsibities for 30 of Entercom's 110 stations, and painted a picture of a lawyer too busy to attend to all her tasks, too busy to vet contests, and who testified that Legal was overloaded.   He also said the attitiude from employees was, "If I don't know if it's dangerous, I don't go to Legal because it might be."

Levine also made some comments which did not draw objections. He talked about John Geary being more interested in advertising sales than the contestants, and told the jury that then 17 year old Jennifer refused to have an abortion, but chose to raise her son Keegan alone,

Levine concluded with a picture of Jennifer in her wedding dress, with her smiling som Keegan hugging her.  When asked what he missed about her most, Keegan simply replied, "Her."

(Editor's Note:  I will post the Defense Opening Statement tomorrow.)







Opening arguments in Strange trial

September 17, 2009

Opening arguments started this afternoon in the trial of Jennifer Strange. (scroll below for video of the Strange story from Broadcast Blues.)   The attorney for the William Strange family, Roger Dreyer, began in the late afternoon to lay out his case against 1) Entercom Sacramento, 2) John Geary, market manager for Entercom Sacramento, and 3) the parent company, Entercom LLC, based in Bala Cynwyd, PA.

Dreyer showed the corporate structure of Entercom to the jury, half men, half women. He pointed out that there were specific guidelines provided by the parent company to subsidiaries regarding contests. One guideline specifically banned contests that were dangerous. Entercom CEO David Field, in a videotaped deposition, admitted that, "Ms. Strange would not have died had this contest not occurred." But, foreshadowing the defense argument, he also said that the people working at the local affiliate KDND had not brought the contest to the parent company's legal division."

But Dreyer already is making the argument that KDND promotion manager Robin Pechota and Entercom parent company attorney Camela Masi had a working relationship which permitted Pechota to use her own judgment about contests.

Opening arguments continue 9:00 AM Friday.

Save Talk Radio! Really?

September 15, 2009

I was strolling through my local county fair this summer, a small fair, a friendly fair, where cows, sheep and pigs outnumber food vendors. The Republican booth caught my eye, but not because of the red white and blue decorations. What caught my eye was the sign they'd posted, the sign that summed up the one key issue of importance to local Republicans.

What would it be, in this raucous political summer of 2009? Anger over bailouts, fear over death panels? No. The number one issue for Amador County Republicans: "Save Talk Radio."



I hadn't realized that the industry that just signed a $400 million contract with Rush Limbaugh needed saving, but they thought so; they even had a petition to save it. Sponsored by a group called "First Amendment Now," the petition read,

      "We hold dearly our right to freedom of speech and the right for others to express their views. We believe that Government should stand aside rather than stand in the way of the discussion of ideas. We believe that because the First Amendment should be about freedom of choice.
      "Therefore, we the undersigned oppose all efforts of any Government to limit, censor, or restrict in any way our unfettered right to free speech on our radios, televisions, the Internet or any other medium."

Wow, I thought, a Republican petition that I can really get behind! Then I read on:
     "We reject any effort to institute (1) the "Fairness Doctrine" or (2) "localism", which in its various forms seeks to establish local committees of "community leaders" to determine if talk radio is "reflecting" the views of the community, or (3) a quota system for ownership of radio stations – or any variance of any of those."

In other words, they advocate free speech for giant corporations, but not for local people. Hmmn.

I wondered how pervasive petitions like this might be. It turns out there are many such petitions on line, promoted by groups much more familiar than "First Amendment Now." So many, in fact, that they have amassed an army of more than a half a million to silence local views.

The Christian Coalition: "They want to pass what is known as the "Fairness Doctrine", which is nothing more than a way for the federal government to demand that all broadcasters must give "equal time" to all points of view."

Equal time to all points of view? What a radical concept.

The Family Research Council: "We need to be aware, however, that liberals may achieve their ends without passing legislation, or even without a new FCC “fairness” rule. They could do it by requiring a fixed amount of local content for radio."

Local content on local airwaves? It must be a Communist plot.

It is easy to dismiss these petitions as fringe. But postings from the Free Speech Alliance reveal something greater:

     1. Obama's FCC will use "localism," "diversity of media ownership" and serving the "public interest" as a backdoor "Fairness" Doctrine. 2. We must make any attempt by Obama's FCC to silence talk radio a political third rail, one that the Administration or Congress dare not touch. 3. We will defend talk radio from these governmental assaults on their industry, and build further the case for free speech in all things.

     "The Left dominates every medium of news delivery, save for talk radio. And they can't stand it, so they want to wipe it off the media map."

The Free Speech Alliance is an arm of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, which for years has been claiming liberal bias in the media with little evidence to back up the claim. This group has been quietly building an army to support corporate owned media and to squelch local voices.

     "MRC’s Free Speech Alliance -- with 69 organizations now involved -- seeks to build the largest possible grassroots Alliance army. So far, we have over 550,000 members, but we need the maximum number possible to go to war when free speech is threatened."

Among the 69 groups in support are: Accuracy in Media, American Conservative Union, National Taxpayers Union, National Religious Broadcasters, Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, World Net Daily, Salem Communications, and Clear Channel.

The creator of the Free Speech Alliance is Seton Motley, the same Seton Motley who is appearing on Glenn Beck's show to target FCC Chief Diversity Officer Mark Lloyd with fabrications about his suggestions in the Center for American Progress/ Free Press study "The Structural Imbalance of Talk Radio"to give local people more control over what they get on their radio stations. (To see an interview with Mark Lloyd on that report, see the film Broadcast Blues, or see a clip of the conversation at www.broadcastblues.tv )

It is clear that the "right" has been quietly assembling troops and is now mounting their attack, an attack largely unanticipated by media reformers, an attack now staged on "Conservative" talk radio and TV (not that there is anything conservative about opposing localism.) Their dominance over radio, where "conservatives" outnumber "liberals" by nine to one, means their army is growing every single day, while the other side didn't even know there was going to be a fight.

An army of 550,000 from County Fairs and the internet.  How many more will there be as recruitment shifts to the public airwaves, currently under the private control of those who wish to keep it that way?

And who will stand ready to fight back?

Shortly after Barack Obama was sworn in as President last January, as Brad Friedman reported at the time, the new White House website "Technology" page signaled a hopeful change, and a call to re-examine the oversight of our public airwaves:

Encourage Diversity in Media Ownership: Encourage diversity in the ownership of broadcast media, promote the development of new media outlets for expression of diverse viewpoints, and clarify the public interest obligations of broadcasters who occupy the nation's spectrum.


A few months later, after the campaign from the right had kicked into full gear, charging that liberals were trying to prevent free speech on the radio, the paragraph was quietly removed from the White House website.

So I ask again...who will stand ready to fight back and in favor of real free speech on our public airwaves?nd the internet. How many more will there be now that recruitment has shifted to the airwaves? And who will stand ready to fight back?

Broadcast Blues: The Jennifer Strange Story


In January 2007, Sacramento radio station KDND ran a water drinking contest which went awry and ended in the death of Jennifer Strange, the young mother of three children.
.
Here is the story about her death from my documentary film "Broadcast Blues." It includes actual audio from the radio show.




In 2009, a jury found Sacramento radio station KDND liable for killing Jennifer Strange. I live blogged the two month trial (and won an award from Sacramento Press for my coverage.)  Find full coverage at SueWilsonReports.com (scroll down the left side for full coverage, and scroll down the right side to see the Media Alliance interview about the case.)
.
Radio station licenses may be challenged by the public only once every eight years; the last date to challenge licenses in California is November 1, 2013.  In spring of 2013, the Media Action Center will legally petition to deny KDND's license to broadcast.  We believe any station which acts so recklessly as to kill someone should no longer be licensed.  We will ask the community of Sacramento to sign onto the petition, and we will publicize this action nationally to maximize pressure on the FCC to revoke this license.
. 
  
 



Radio Speech is not Free Speech

August 17, 2009

August 11, 2009, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, in a unanimous vote, became the first elected body in the United States to stand up to Hate Radio.  Their resolution urges "the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to conduct a comprehensive investigation on hate speech in the media, allowing public participation via public hearings, and asks the NTIA to update its 1993 report on the Role of Telecommunications in Hate Crimes."

For two years, San Francisco's Hispanic/Latino Anti-Defamation Coalition has been trying to get some traction on this issue.  They've staged rallies against Michael Savage worked with the Media Alliance, Common Cause and Broadcast Blues to protest hate radio, and supported the National Hispanic Media Coaltion's campaign to convince the FCC and NTIA to act.   But HLADC leader Aurora Grajedas saw she could better effect national change by working with her own city's board of supervisors.  Acting locally is a good lesson for all activists.    

Still, there is resistance to any such study, as opponents charge these groups are trying to shut down the first amendment.  But let us be clear, Radio Speech is not Free Speech.  I will stand by Glenn Beck's right to stand on the street corner and say illegal immigrants should be made into a new fuel called "Mexinol."  I may not like it, but I stand by his right to say it.  But there is a difference between shouting on the street corner and broadcasting all over the country. 

Broadcasting pioneers witnessed the power of propaganda with radio Tokyo Rose, so they worked with government on two key broadcast regulations.  First, to qualify for a license to broadcast on the public airwaves, stations had to serve the public interest, which became defined as local news, political debates, equal time, and a rule that said no personal attacks.  Second, one person could own just 6 radio stations, nationwide. There were a lot of "street corners" in radio. 

Today there are almost none.  The 1996 Telecommunications Act changed the law so one person can own unlimited numbers of radio stations nationwide, and up to eight in a single town.  It means a handful of businessmen now decide what we all get to hear on our local radio dials.  They decide which few musicians get airplay; even Bruce Springsteen can't stand up to Clear Channel (see that story at www.broadcastblues.tv .)  And this tiny group of older, white, conservative men also decides which political message we get to hear on our radio and which we do not.  They make sure we can hear conservatives in every corner of the country and make sure we do not get to hear moderates or liberals.  (They say only conservative talk gets ratings, but that is not true.  You have to see my film for that story.)  If they want us to hear hate, they have the power to program hate.  Exclusively.)

Plus Ronald Reagan did away with requirements for political debates, equal time, and the personal attack rule; those changes made it so much easier to do Hate Radio.  It is very hard to attack someone with hate speech and then have to give them equal time to respond; you might have to actually look them in the eye.

So today, Rush Limbaugh promotes violence on 600 radio stations, Glenn Beck promotes Mexinol on 400 more,  Michael Savage calls autism a fraud and Latinos criminals on another 400;  the list of conservative hatemongers and their numbers goes on and on.  Hate and lies, broadcast with millions of watts of power into every little town and farm, backed by corporations which have a lock on the market and won't allow any other voice on the air to push back. 

It is Radio Speech, and it is not free; it is owned and managed by just a few people who share a poltical agenda.   It clearly does not serve the public interest. (Reagan couldn't do away with that part of public policy, even though today's broadcasters pretend that he did.) 

And now, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors is calling on the FCC, which enforces public interest standards, to at least study what the Leadership Council on Civil Rights sees a correlation between hate radio and violent hate crimes.  They also call on the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which advises the President on telecommunications policy,. to update their last study of 1993, completed long before the media paradigm shift of 1996.

But even if the FCC and NTIA do quantify that which we already innately understand, (that hate and lies on the radio do incite violence,) they have little power to change the situation.  It took an Act of Congress to get us into this media mess, and it will take another to get us out of it.

But it will take many more local actions to get their attention.

Bravo, Aurora.

Blue Dog Showdown

July 23, 2009

    There's a showdown at the House Energy and Commerce Committee corral.  Seven Blue Dog Democrat members are banding together, and if they don't get their way, they can gun down the healthcare bill. 

     The Blue Dog Seven are spooked by pressure from their constituents and recent polls that show American's approval of Obama's healthcare initiative has dropped below 50 percent for the first time.  

    Drive across the seven states they represent: Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Ohio, Tennessee, and Utah, turn on your car radio, and you'll know why public opinion has changed.  According to Pew research, 22 percent of Americans get their news from talk radio.  And conservative talkers have been lying to their listeners about what's in the healthcare bill.



    Lies from Sean Hannity like, "If you don't have private insurance the year that this bill is passed, you can't get that later on from your employer."  Lies from Rush Limbaugh that the bill would "outlaw individual private coverage."  Lies provided in talking points from the Republican National Committee like "Democrats are proposing a government controlled health insurance system, which will control care, treatments, medicines and even what doctors a patient may see."

Tell a lie often enough, and people will believe it. 

And there is nobody there to call them on their lies.  Nobody there to set the record straight.  Nobody to push back against the propaganda that corporate radio promotes in its own political self interest.  In the Blue Dog Seven states, just three stations broadcast any kind of progressive talk. Three progressive radio stations in seven entire states.  But Sean Hannity "freely" prevaricates on dozens of radio stations; Rush Limbaugh deceives people on 98 in those seven states alone.  98 publicly owned frequencies where public debate comes second to selling ads for Snapple.  

Special assistant to the President for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy, Susan Crawford told Broadcasting and Cable magazine, "The administration understands the important role traditional terrestrial broadcasting continues to play." 

Maybe they should be listening to FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, who says in "Broadcast Blues," "If you're concerned about health care or you're concerned about the environment as your number one issue, fine, but a piece of advice from me, is you better make media reform your number two issue, because you won't get anywhere on number one without media reform." 

Former Republican Senator Trent Lott had it right when he said Conservative Talk Radio is running the country.   There needs to be a showdown, but it's the 1996 Telecommunications Act that should be gunned down.

It's War. Media War.

August 10, 2009

It's war.

Hundreds of protesters are turning Democratic Town Hall meetings into combat zones in a battle over health care. They are angry, really angry. Barack Obama's healthcare plan, they believe, is going to euthanize Grandma.

I would be angry, too, if they were going to kill my grandmother, wouldn't you? Except, of course, the government is not going to euthanize anybody; the Obama adminstration, like most family doctors, just want people to prepare advance directives, statements which give people control over their own end of life issues.

But the protesters don't know that. They really believe that the government is going to kill their grandparents.

So mad as hell, they soldier into town halls ready to fight, into forums like the one Rep. Lloyd Doggett held in South Austin, Texas. Elise Hu of KVUE News reported that Doggett's "opponents have become a vocal, viral army."

They are vocal, and they are an army. But their "viral" campaign is aided by a giant radio and TV cheerleading squad. As with the "Tea Parties," Fox News and AM Radio are promoting both the town halls and the lies to tens of millions of unwitting people. No wonder people are upset; trusted voices are scaring them to death. Voices like Rush Limbaugh, on 600 radio outlets, telling them, "as Obama said, they'll give 'em some pain killers, and let 'em loop out until they die." Laura Ingraham, on 300 stations, "Some will call them death camps." Glenn Beck, on 400 more, "Why is there no more discussion than there is on Sarah Palin, and what she said over the weekend that there would be a death panel for her son, Trig? That’s quite a statement. I believe it to be true..."

So, average people, shut out of the facts and terrified of the Obama plan, storm into town halls to shout down their elected representatives.

Here's where it gets good: this irate army creates just the kind of spectacle news loves to cover, so the "real" news amplifies the falsehoods way beyond the walls of the hall. The mainstream news no longer takes the time to clarify the facts, but instead becomes an effective PR machine for the right wing war of words. (See more on this phenomena in my Tea Party Story here at suewilsonreports.com.)

Meanwhile, President Obama starts a new website, www.whitehouse.gov/RealityCheck to counter the propaganda. But does he really think a website, any website, can stand up to the daily barrage on the battlefield of Talk Radio, an attack mounted on thousands of different fronts in every corner of the country? An arena where right wing mouthpieces dominate their opponents by ten to one? Can any internet action combat the giant corporate-financed microphones which, 24-7, since 1996, have been using Democrats as target practice, and which now martial hate and lies to attack Obama's plan, presidency, and even his citizenship? Where true believers number in the tens of millions, and warriors can be influenced and recruited simply by people turning on their radios?

(Think it's a coincidence that places where we've seen the most anger, like Michigan, Arkansas, Missouri, Philladelphia, and Austin also get zero progressive talk radio?)

There's a war, that much is certain. But the "healthscare" debate is just a skirmish. The real war Conservatives have been waging and winning is over facts and truth. It is a war they have been fighting for decades, and the Democrats have not yet figured out there's even a battle, so they keep losing.

Pew Research shows fewer than half of Americans believe news organizations get their facts right. That's way fewer than in 1985.

Maybe that's because the war on truth and truth tellers started much earlier. David Brock, former Conservative writer and founder of Media Matters, in an interview for Broadcast Blues, told me "the conservative movement going back to 1969, has had a coordinated and well financed attack on journalism in this country. …While they claim that the complaint is one of liberal bias… the real goal is to disable journalism from being able to do its job independently and neutrally." Worse, he says, "A lot of the falsehood and misinformation that's coming out of the conservative media is coming out intentionally . In other words, they know they're misinforming people, and that's a significant problem."

The Right has been piling up major victories in this war over the control of information for dozens of years. Dateline 1987: Ronald Reagan dismantles the Fairness Doctrine. 1996: Conservatives rewrite Telecommunications law so they can control the message on almost all the nation's radio stations. 2003: Fox News gets a court ruling in the "Akre/Wilson vs. WTVT" case that stations can legally lie to the public.

In USA TODAY, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-CA and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-MD write, “Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American. Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades.”

Wake up, Democratic Leadership, we have been at war over facts for decades, and our democracy is suffering because of it. Thomas Jefferson said, "A democracy cannot be both ignorant and free." Only you can save us, and it's about time you get into the fight.